CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Briefs

“Undemocratic hall pass”: SEC sued over no-action request rule change

Shareholder advocacy groups have taken the SEC to court over changes to rules that govern the exclusion of shareholder proposals. Democracy Forward, an organisation that has legally challenged the previous Trump administration on several occasions, filed the lawsuit on behalf of As You Sow and the Interfaith Centre on Corporate Responsibility.


NZI Transition Equities Summit

15 April 2026 | London | Register here


The rule, formally known as Rule 14a-8, required companies wishing to exclude a shareholder proposal to notify the SEC explaining the grounds. In response, the SEC would then assess the validity of the claim and issue ‘no-action’ letters.

Now, the plaintiffs claim, the SEC’s revised policy effectively accepts a company’s exclusion of shareholder proposals at face value. This removes the requirement for companies to justify the exclusion.

“Since proposals are generally non-binding, the only real benefit of these changes appears to be shielding companies from having to consider hard issues that would be easier to sweep under the rug”, explains Danielle Fugere, As You Sow’s president and chief counsel.

Sky Perryman, President and CEO of Democracy Forward says the new policy is inconsistent with existing SEC rules. “The new SEC policy is an undemocratic hall pass to corporate mismanagement that sends a message to investors to ‘sit down and shut up’ about how the company they own is managed”, commented Perryman.

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, argues that the SEC adopted the policy change without the legally mandated process under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

“The APA requires federal agencies to act through transparent procedures; provide reasoned explanations for policy changes, regardless of the language the government uses to characterize them; and to give affected stakeholders an opportunity to comment before altering decades of the operation of existing regulations”, the complaint, reads.

In previous years, no-action requests covered a wide range of issues including climate risk management, corporate lobbying, financed emissions and biodiversity impact disclosures.


Institutional Investment Conferences & Summits from Longview Networks


Content Tags: Policy  Engagement  Stewardship  US  In-Brief 

Related Content