CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
News & Views

Quiet convergence: why UK endowments are turning to private markets for climate solutions

Simon Hallett, head of climate strategy at Cambridge Associates predicts an increase in private market allocations by endowments and foundations. Climate solutions, he reckons, is the reason why

Strange as it may seem, endowment funds and private markets go back a long way. Endowments and foundations (E&F) in the US began exploring the terrain of alternative assets back in the 1970s. Harvard’s endowment fund and the Ford Foundation were prominent pioneers.

This US model of endowment investing tends to differ from the one across the pond. Endowments in the UK historically preferred their fixed income and equity-tilted portfolios.

Now, a search for climate solutions is making convergence more likely. Simon Hallett, head of climate strategy at Cambridge Associates, told Net Zero Investor more about an emerging E&F appetite for climate-driven private market investment.

Structural shift

As residents of the wider asset owner universe, endowments and foundations tend to play by slightly different rules. While pension fund footprints in climate solutions are often tied to risk and return, E&Fs are more flexible.

“In the E&F market, you have organisations that have a higher degree of flexibility (compared to pension schemes) in what they do. Their liabilities are not defined by an actuary. They tend to be defined by intent”, Hallett says.

That intent, Hallet reckons, is now being sharpened. Particularly, on the climate front. Internally, governance structures are changing in response.

“10 years ago, grant giving and investment committees didn’t really speak to each other. Now, we are seeing organisations bring the two together. This has prompted news ways of thinking on the climate solutions side”, he explains.

Governance aside, E&F climate strategies are a function of incentives. Perpetual endowments for instance, share a common incentive with their pension fund counterparts – both make decisions in the interests of future generations.

A mix of intent, governance and incentives has shaped the sector’s demand for climate-driven investment. “There is definitely a trend to create more space in E&F asset allocation for dedicated exposure to climate solutions”, notes Hallett.

Private markets

That interest in climate strategies, is headed for private markets.

Hallett recalls the US endowment model, stressing that endowments are no strangers to investing in private markets. “The US model of endowment investing takes a long-term view and embraces private markets. E&Fs were some of the first investors in VC back in the 1970s”, he explains.

Now, he sees the UK’s E&F investors moving in that direction. Climate solutions, he says, are the reason why. In addition to a more obvious factor: returns.

“E&Fs are looking at the higher end of the return spectrum. They’re thinking about deploying small amounts of money and generating a decent return. So that’s driving an interest in private markets”, he says.

E&Fs are also a distinct type of asset owner, in that they are known to think beyond the returns box. Three Sainsbury Family Trusts, for example, collectively operate the Climate Change Collaboration (CCC).

Among other things, the CCC is involved in a decade-long movement to advocate for fossil fuels divestment. “The focus for the CCC Trusts has evolved to place a greater emphasis on initiatives which enable investment in climate and nature solutions”, says a filing from Mark Leonard Trust, one of the CCC members.

Impact, in other words, matters a great deal That leads E&Fs to prefer very focused strategies. Private markets offer that in relative abundance.

“In private markets, they can channel funds to strategies that are very focused. Something that is hard to do in public markets”, commented Hallett.

To some, dealing with private markets, and managers thereof, will be familiar territory. The University of Cambridge endowment fund, for example, has been working with its private market managers to improve reporting and decarbonisation targets.

The endowment’s disclosures show that in 2023, one of its managers became the world’s first private equity firm to set a science-based portfolio coverage target for absolute emissions.

If Hallett is right, these are signs of things to come. In 2026, E&Fs in the UK will start resembling their American counterparts. A convergence in private market appetites is underway, fuelled by a willingness to invest in climate solutions.


Related Content