CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
News & Views

Where climate change scenario planning sits in investment

Many of the world’s major economies are working towards a 1.5°C Paris Agreement-aligned future, but investors must prepare portfolios for the climate change outcome – whatever this ends up being.

Like any macro trend, investors have to consider how climate change could impact their portfolios. The Paris Agreement set a deadline for many of the world’s economies to meet and – several years on – various scientists and policymakers are unsure about this being met.

This is placing a requirement upon investors to ensure their portfolios are prepared for whatever the climate change outcome is. Peter Michaelis, head of the sustainable investment team at Liontrust Asset Management, uses climate change scenario planning in his work and says other investors need to recognise the importance of this.

“We believe the market continues to underestimate both the rate of change needed to decarbonise and the magnitude of the positive impact on companies helping this transition, as well as the structural decline in businesses continuing with carbon-intensive products and services where there are lower-carbon alternatives,” says Michaelis.


Some firms are already taking this into consideration. Investment consultancy Redington is seeing this with many clients. Specifically in the UK, the Department for Work and Pensions has provided guidance for pension schemes to conduct scenario analysis and choose a baseline scenario – to monitor portfolio activity against on an annual basis.

“We have found the ‘disorderly transition’ scenario to be a popular baseline amongst our own clients,” says Redington global head of sustainable investment Anastasia Guha.

“Those who have set decarbonisation targets typically look at their portfolio at an asset class level, identifying the most pragmatic way to decarbonise without impacting portfolio returns. Scenario analysis can provide useful insights to help prioritise asset classes and issuers that need attention.”

bxs-quote-alt-left

We believe the market continues to underestimate both the rate of change needed to decarbonise and the magnitude of the positive impact on companies helping this transition.

bxs-quote-alt-right
Peter Michaelis, head of sustainable investment team, Liontrust Asset Management

Putting scenario analysis into practice

With it obviously yet to be seen what happens with climate change, some firms are preparing options for various outcomes. Isobel Edwards, a green, social and impact bond analyst at NN Investment Partners, is viewing debt securities through this filter, and separating these based on what climate change outcome they are aligned with.

“For the past couple of years, we were monitoring the 2°C alignment of the issuers in the portfolio and then decided to track the net-zero-by-2050 commitments of the issuers through published plans and/or external verification,” says Edwards. “We were able to see with current emissions data who was falling out of line with the 2°C scenario and with net-zero plan data we were able to see who was planning for the 1.5°C scenario in the future.”

Emissions data can be a crucial part of this. Though data is a well-documented challenge for net-zero conscious investors, Edwards will often try and make her own assumption by analysing other metrics.

“It’s important to have a monitoring process in place to make sure that the plans which issuers make are coming to fruition,” says Edwards. “Ideally, they publish interim plans, like 2025, 2030, etc. so that when the time comes, you can go to the issuer and check if they are where they need to be according to their published plan. It’s an important accountability tool.”

At Liontrust, Michaelis and his team follow a three-step approach to implementing scenario planning within decision-making processes. This starts with identifying companies reducing emissions regardless of the outcome: “Of our 20 sustainable themes, all those associated with increasing resource efficiency will benefit from, and contribute to, the shift towards an ultra-low carbon economy.”

"Second, we want to ensure the companies we own understand the magnitude of the energy transition and are managing their businesses in a proactive way that protects them from inevitably tightening regulations,” adds Michaelis who explains the third step is to omit investment in sectors with carbon-intensive characteristics.

Scenario planning has a key role to play in investment for the long term and it is clear there are both physical and transitional risks for portfolio managers to navigate as the situation worsens. However, there is still a need to be flexible, as Guha explains: “Scenarios are not forecasts. They measure how much risk the portfolio is exposed to from the transition to a low-carbon economy. While asset allocation decisions shouldn’t be based solely on climate scenarios, they can help guide portfolio construction.”


Related Content