CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Article
News & Views

US midterms: investors hope blue wave reduces climate policy risk

With the Democrats winning a majority in the House and Senate, investors are now considering if growing opposition to Trump might result in a less adversarial ennvironment for climate investors.

Content Tags: Policy  Regulation  Energy  Renewables  US 

Democrats have staged a comeback in the US midterm elections, winning majorities across both the House of representatives and the Senate. A changing of the legislative guard in Washington DC has a range of implications for investors – particularly those keeping an eye on America’s energy and climate policies.

The results point to palpable voter discontent over higher energy prices potentially lower policy uncertainty courtesy a blue wave in the midterms.


Private Markets and Portfolio Construction | 5 November 2026 | Central Court, London


Backlash

Initial responses to the results highlight the role of higher oil prices and falling support for the Trump administration. “US voters blame Trump for high prices. That has cost the Republicans dearly”, says Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg.

The bank’s house view is that mounting Republican pressure on the Trump administration could yield a deal with Iran and lower oil prices. Berenberg’s forecasts expect Brent crude to fall back down to $75 a barrel by the end of 2027.

Schmieding reckons the result points to a broader backlash. “The vote shows that the political pendulum is swinging against Trump policies. That can impact business decisions in sectors seen as favoured by Trump such as fossil fuels and artificial intelligence”, he adds.

Checks and balances

With democrats now in majority, America’s legislature is more likely to put up checks and balances against executive power – lowering policy volatility.

“I expect the effect of having real checks and balances in the US will lead to rising risk and falling uncertainty”, says Nikesh Patel, an independent trustee.

A divided house reduces the prospect of frequent and fast-paced policy change. Deborah Cunningham, CIO, global liquidity markets at Federated Hermes says markets broadly favour that outcome.

“The blue wave means the federal government is sure to be divided on most issues. That typically creates a blockade against new legislation — an environment which broad financial markets traditionally view favourably as variables decrease”, she notes.

Gerald Alain P Chen-Young, CIO of the US-based National Public Pension Fund Association Benefits (NPPFA) expects a change in the government’s approach to energy and climate policies. A change, he says will be ‘broader, more thoughtful, measured, balanced and pragmatic’.

For investors in American renewable energy projects, a change in approach is welcome news. Share prices for listed clean energy firms with a US presence have rallied as markets opened.

“The election result is a clear positive for renewable developers with US exposure, as it reduces some of the policy uncertainty that has weighed on sentiment in recent years”, says Tancrede Fulop, senior equity analyst at Morningstar.

The Trump administration has targeted win energy projects, seeking to cancel leases and issuing stop work orders for previously approved projects. 

‘While it's too early to call this a turning point for US offshore wind, the outcome lowers the risk of further regulatory disruption and provides a more stable backdrop for projects already underway’, Fulop adds.

Content Tags: Policy  Regulation  Energy  Renewables  US 

Related Content