CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
Briefs

Asset managers dropping support for biodiversity resolutions

The world’s largest asset managers have scaled back their support for biodiversity and deforestation-related shareholder resolutions in 2024, despite growing investor interest in the issue.

As interest in nature gains momentum, shareholders filed a record 18 nature-related resolutions in 2024. However, not a single one passed due to opposition from major shareholders, new research reveals.

Support for biodiversity and deforestation-related resolutions from asset managers has dropped sharply, from 59% in 2022 to just 13% in 2024, according to a report by campaign group Global Witness.

The report also highlighted that US-based managers, including BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, voted against key biodiversity resolutions at higher rates than their European or UK counterparts, who were more likely to back such resolutions. The analysis, based on public filings in databases provided by the Principles for Responsible Investment and Ceres, used relevant search terms to identify voting patterns.

Ashley Thomson, senior US Policy Adviser at Global Witness, commented: “This report paints a worrying picture of leading US financiers’ lacklustre approach to biodiversity loss. There’s a clear disconnect between these asset managers’ rhetoric and actions, which undermines their power to drive real change.”

Listed companies at the heart of investor battles to tackle deforestation include Tyson Foods, the world’s second-largest food processor and a member of the “Big Four” meat processors controlling 80% of the US beef market, as well as Brazilian meatpacker JBS.

BlackRock declined to comment on the findings, instead pointing to its voting choice programme, which allows investors to adopt different stances at AGMs.

Content Tags: Activism  Stewardship  Nature  US  In-Brief 

Related Content