CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
CO2 / PPM /Annual Averages / Data Source: noaa.gov 1980 338.91ppm 1981 340.11ppm 1982 340.86ppm 1983 342.53ppm 1984 344.07ppm 1985 345.54ppm 1986 346.97ppm 1987 348.68ppm 1988 351.16ppm 1989 352.78ppm 1990 354.05ppm 1991 355.39ppm 1992 356.1ppm 1993 356.83ppm 1994 358.33ppm 1995 360.18ppm 1996 361.93ppm 1997 363.04ppm 1998 365.7ppm 1999 367.8ppm 2000 368.97ppm 2001 370.57ppm 2002 372.59ppm 2003 375.14ppm 2004 376.96ppm 2005 378.97ppm 2006 381.13ppm 2007 382.9ppm 2008 385.01ppm 2009 386.5ppm 2010 388.76ppm 2011 390.63ppm 2012 392.65ppm 2013 395.39ppm 2014 397.34ppm 2015 399.65ppm 2016 403.09ppm 2017 405.22ppm 2018 407.62ppm 2019 410.07ppm 2020 412.44ppm 2021 414.72ppm 2022 418.56ppm 2023 421.08ppm 2024 424.61ppm 2025 427.35ppm
News & Views

High conviction bets are reshaping the climate funds market

New MSCI analysis shows net outflow from listed multi-asset funds with thematic convictions driving broad market performance

The market for listed climate funds has grown in recent years. In 2019, these vehicles attracted some $60bn. By 2025, that cumulative number stood at $652bn. That is according to data from MSCI’s transition finance tracker.

Estimates of the listed climate funds market, now place the number at $709bn. In the first six months of 2026, that reflects a gain of $57.6bn.


NZI Transition and Climate Investment Conference | 22 October | London | Register here


Yet, the numbers tell only part of the story. MSCI Institute’s latest analysis, seen by Net Zero Investor, shows a push away from diversified exposure, skewed return distribution and a market converging on high conviction bets.

Structural trends

MSCI’s mapping of the universe reveals 1527 funds on offer. “Climate funds are growing, but the capital story is complicated”, says Rumi Mahmood, MSCI Institute’s research director.

So far this year, assets have risen sharply. Mahmood reckons this comes down to returns rather than capital inflows. “The gains are almost entirely return-driven rather than a sign of broad investor re-engagement. Net new flows are thin, and what inflows exist are narrowly concentrated in high-performing equity strategies.”, he explains.

Roughly 88% of the market’s growth came from price appreciation. New net inflows contributed just over $7bn – or 12% of the growth story.

In AUM terms, the market is dominated by equity plays. 70% of the fund universe is in equities, which is also the only asset class with relatively high net inflows at $7bn. In comparison fixed income net flows are at $1.3bn.

Thematic conviction

Mahmood’s reading of the numbers suggests thematic convictions are driving investor interest in climate funds.

“The market is bifurcating around thematic convictions like clean energy, emerging market climate equity, and nuclear are capturing both performance and flows”, he notes.

On the other hand, investor conviction around diversified climate solutions investing seems to be changing. “Multi-asset climate blends are in net outflow, suggesting investors are moving away from diversified climate solutions toward targeted, high-conviction bets”, Mahmood adds.

Climate performance

Performance is up, on average, but skews shape the data. 91% of the funds MSCI mapped were in positive return territory, year to date.

Median YTD returns for equity funds is estimated to be just over 11% while real returns for fixed income funds are essentially flat. Clean energy funds, MSCI’s analysis points out, have shown ‘the strongest combination of performance and flows’.

All in all, median fund return for listed climate funds is around 8.25% and the mean is closer to $12.7%. That difference, a telling sign of a skew, stands out. A small cluster of funds seems to be driving averages up.

Mahmood points to the source – Korea. “A small cluster of funds, heavily concentrated in Korean green economy themes, is pulling the averages up significantly”, he says.

59 funds in MSCI’s universe registered YTD returns north of 50%. These were almost entirely linked to Korean electric vehicles, hydrogen and the country’s green new deal policy stimulus.

To Mahmood, that raises questions over broad based capital allocation.

“The structural question the data raises is whether this is genuine momentum”, he asks, “or a narrow rally that has yet to translate into the kind of broad capital rotation that climate finance needs”.


Longview Networks: Institutional Investment Conferences and Summits



Related Content